[Turkmath:9909] CERN ve Einstein

[Abdullah HARMANCI]

Yılmaz Akyıldızın Dikkatine

Sen fizik ile yakından ilgilisin.Santilli merkezinden bana gelen aşağıya aldığım makaleyi senin dikkatine sunuyorum.Konu hakkında daha önce de yazışmıştık.Senin ve liste üyelerinin de ilgileneceğini umduğum ilginç bir makale.Expert olarak konu hakkında bilgi verirsen sevineceğim.İlgi duyuyorum ama antimatter yı gözleyecek teleskobum yok.


Anladığım kadarıyla, CERN de ki deneyleri ve Einstein yı denetleyen yazılardan biri.Karşı maddenin varlığının ispatı ve karşı maddenin yapılan uygun teleskoplarla gözlenmesi.





Selamlar.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

June 1, 2014

Quantum mechanics is "faith," string theory is "fashion," and cosmic inflation is "fantasy.".
Roger Penrose(http://sciencefriday.com/segment/04/04/2014/sir-roger-penrose-cosmic-inflation-is-fantasy.html?utm_source=Science+Friday+Mailing+List&utm_campaign=08bd59ee1c-Newsletter_April_04_2014_Final&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10d8eab927-08bd59ee1c-53893781)

DENUNCIATION OF OBSCURANTISM AT CERN ON ANTIMATTER
WITH REQUEST TO TERMINATE CERN EMPLOYEE GABRIELE VENEZIANO


Pamela Fleming
Spokesperson, The Institute for Basic Research
35246 U. S. 19 North #215, Palm Harbor, FL 34684, U.S.A.
Web site http://www.i-b-r.org(http://www.i-b-r.org/) Email: basicresearch at i-b-r.org

addressed to

Dr. Rolf-Dieter Heuer, Director-General
CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 767 12 40(tel:%2B41%2022%20767%2012%2040), E-mail: rolf.heuer at cern.ch

Dr. Sergio Bertolucci, Director for Research and Computing 
CERN , CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 767 12 66(tel:%2B41%2022%20767%2012%2066), E-mail: +41 22 767 29 91 <sergio.bertolucci at cern.ch" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);" target="_blank">sergio.bertolucci at cern.ch

Dr. Livio Mapelli, Head of Physics Department
CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
Tel. Dear Drs. Heuer, Bertolucci, and Mapelli,

I regret to denounce the ongoing obscurantism at CERN on the political handling of the test of the gravity of antimatter conducted with the alleged "anti-Hydrogen atom" based on the capture of a positron by the alleged "anti-proton." This obscurantism has been enforced for many years by the known scientific cartel on Einstein at CERN via the organized denial and suppression of serious technical evidence according to which the claimed "anti-protons" may in reality not be antiparticles but a new form of proton known as "pseudo-proton." Consequently, the ongoing obscurantism at CERN may imply the misuse of billions of dollars of taxpayer money from the U.S.A. and Europe (see Re. [1] and the Appendix of ref. [2]). 

We here request the conduction at CERN of tests to establish beyond doubt the antiparticle character of the claimed "anti-protons" prior to any gravity test. We also request the conduction at CERN of Santilli comparative measurement of the gravity of electron and positrons in a 10 meter long, horizontal super-cooled and super-vacuum tube [3,4] because it has been declared to be "resolutory" by experimentalists in the field [5,6]. By comparison, the measurement of the gravity of the claimed "anti-Hydrogen atom" is known to be amenable to manipulations by the organized scientific cartel at CERN for adapting nature to Einsteinian theories (see the BBC propaganda [7]).

The ongoing politics at CERN on antimatter is well under way to become a duplicate of the scientific obscurantism on "God's particle" [8] which has been also perpetrated under complete oblivion of opposing experimental evidence on the impossibility for Einstein's special relativity and quantum mechanics to be exactly valid within the hyperdense media in the interior of hadrons and of high energy scattering regions (see Volume IV of Refs. [9]). The latter obscurantism included the political interpretation of a few events out of trillions of events as being evidence of "Higgs-type particles," then twisting this highly questionable stand as being evidence for true Higgs bosons, and then culminating with the usual manipulation of the Nobel Committee a cover up for a de facto scientific scam [10].

This open denunciation has been rendered necessary by the rejections with offensive language of any attempt to establish a minimal scientific process on antimatter at CERN. This implies the offensive trashing of proposals not only by members of our Institute from various countries, but also by independent scholars. This open denunciation has also been rendered necessary to establish a scientific record so that posterity may one day correct the obscurantism on antimatter at CERN perpetrated by the organized scientific cartel for the pursuit of self-serving interests on Einstein.

1. Matter-Antimatter annihilate into photons without any massive particles
The main criticism moved against CERN antimatter program is that, to be true antiparticles, antiprotons should solely annihilate into photons without massive particle. On the contrary, all available experimental evidence at CERN and elsewhere on the claimed "anti-protons" is that they annihilate into a shower of particles, as it is the case in the proton-antiproton annihilation of the Bose-Einstein correlation.

The theoretical evidence on the necessity for particle-antiparticle to annihilate solely into photons is known since the First International Conference on Antimatter held in Sepino, Italy, in May 1996, that was attended by physicists from CERN, FERMILAB, and other laboratories. Yet said participants have ignored this crucial evidence, and subsequently obstructed, rather than implement a serious scientific process in antimatter, thus leaving this denunciation as the only possible alternative.

[[ More recently the CERN directorate denied participation of representative physicists to the Second International Conference on Antimatter held in San Marino, Italy, Curriculum(http://www.workshops-hadronic-mechanics.org/" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204);" target="_blank">http://www.workshops-hadronic-mechanics.org/ for the evident intent of preventing the knowledge to experimental evidence opposing CERN beliefs.]]

In a nutshell, the Italian-American scientist R. M. Santilli (Santilli isoduality(represented with an upper "d" letter) which allows the map of any classical or operator formulation of matter into an anti-isomorphic form as needed for antimatter.

In this way, Santilli achieved the first known classical representation of neutral (as well as charged) antimatter bodies, including the first known representation of the gravity of an antimatter body thanks to Santilli isodual mathematics which, he initiated when he was at the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University in the early 1980s under DOE support. The related isodual physics verifies all known experimental data on antimatter at the classical level, as well as at the particle level where isoduality is equivalent is charge conjugation [3].

Whether at the classical or operator level, particle-antiparticle systems verify the new symmetry of isoselfduality (invariance under isoduality), which is beautifully verified by the conventional Dirac equation, thus confirming its representation of a true electron-positron system (see Ref. [3] Section 2.3).

Santilli's discovery at the 1996 Sepino Conference [11] is that electrons and positrons cannot solely annihilate into photons, as popularly believed to adapt particle physics to Feynman's diagrams

(1) e- + e-d → γ, e-d = e+

because such a decay violates the symmetry of isoselfduality in the l.h.s. In order to verify isoselfduality in both sides, it is necessary that electron-positron annihilation produces a conventional photons plus Santilli isodual photon [11] which is physically distinct from the conventional photon in a variety of experimentally verifiable ways [3]

(2) e- + e-d → γ + γd.

It then follows that the current experimental evidence on the claimed "annihilation" of protons with the claimed "anti-protons" at CERN (denoted "p-bar-"), as available rom the Bose-Einstein correlation and other experiments

(3) p+ + "p-bar-" → particle showers

violates Santilli isoselfduality as well as the CPT theorem (when written without ad hoc manipulations), thus casting serious doubts as to whether the claimed "anti-protons" are true antiparticles. Since the current grid of the organized scientific cartel on Einstein does not permit scientific democracy for qualified inquiries, public denunciation is the only possible as well as appropriate expression.

2. Confirmation by the 1908 Tunguska explosion in Siberia
As well known to CERN physicists, the 1908 Tunguska explosion in Siberia knocked down trees over one hundred thousand acres by leaving no crater or solid residue in the ground, which occurrence can be explained via an ice comet.

However, the explosion excited the entire Earth atmosphere to such an extent that days later people in Sidney, Australia could read the newspaper at midnight without artificial light. This latter aspect can be solely explained as being due to an antimatter asteroid annihilating in our upper atmosphere into high energy photons.

In the event the annihilation responsible for the Tunguska explosion had released showers of particles, the trees in the ground would have been carbonized, since the explosion had an energy equivalent of one thousand Hiroshima atomic bombs.

Therefore, when analyzed within a serious scientific environment outside the organized scientific crime on Einstein, the Tunguska explosion confirms Santilli isoselfduality and, therefore, provides serious evidence that the claimed "anti-protons" at CERN are not antiparticles.

3. Obscurantism in antigravity
It is generally believed these days that "antigravity violates Einstein general relativity." The ongoing obscurantism at CERN in antimatter can be first seen from a rather general perception that the above belief is the origin of the selection at CERN of an extremely complex test of gravity so that its results could be manipulated to achieve a pre-determined compatibility with Einstein, while much more resolutory tests, such as Santilli's gravity test [3.4], are dismissed without technical arguments.

The ongoing obscurantism is deepened by the fact that the violation of general relativity by the possible detection of antigravity is claimed without any serious technical argument, thus revealing its true political character. As a first example, the violation of general relativity is claimed on grounds of the CPT theorem. 

However, as well known to CERN physicists but apparently not spoken, the rigorous application of the CPT theorem requires the use of a "flat" spacetime with "linear" operators on a Hilbert space. The claim of applicability of the CPT theorem to a theory, such as general relativity, which is a purely "classical," highly "nonlinear" and based on a "curved" space, can only be dubbed as preposterous.

Additionally, general relativity is a "noncanonical" theory which means that its hypothetical operator image must be nonunitary for consistency and experts in antimatter are expected to know that conventionally formulated nonunitary theories violate causality (not hadronic mechanics thanks to the new isomathematics). 

Another argument against antigravity is that it violates the equivalence principle of general relativity, again, without any technical foundation whatsoever. General relativity was conceived decades before the discovery of antimatter and, as such, said theory has no mean whatsoever for the conjugation of the gravitational field from a matter-body to that of an antimatter-body that is generally assumed as neutral (remember Einstein equations G_{\mu\nu} = 0 and not to a an elm source!). Believing that the equivalence principle also applies to antimatter (as a condition to include antigravity), literally implies the total absence of any conjugation from matter to antimatter. Shall we keep going to unmask additional dark pages of science at CERN?

Santilli has achieved the first known rigorous, geometrical and physical representation of the gravitational field of of neutral or charged antimatter-bodies [3] thanks to his isodual map. Santilli isodual gravitation includes its own equivalence principle as a anti-isomorphic image of the conventional one. Not only there is no conflict between the two principles, but both are necessary for consistency.

Santilli isodual physics predicts indeed a negative curvature tensor (antigravity) between matter and antimatter at all levels of study, from the Newton-Santilli isodual equations for neutral or charged antiparticles (the first in recorded history), to the Riemann-Santilli isodual geometry. Antigravity emerges quite forcefully in the projection of the isodual world into our world or vice versa without any fanciful violation of any theory for matter.

4. Santilli recollections
Besides assistance for the technical content of this blog, Santilli has released the following statement: Emilio Segre' was a true gentleman, besides being a great physicist. I had the pleasure of meeting Emilio during scientific conferences and exchanging a few letters with him when I was at MIT in the mid 1970s.


Since I have been interested in antimatter since my graduate studies in the 1960s, in the respectful but provocative style used by Italian to Italians, I wrote Emilio asking to clarify that in his studies of antiprotons he tacitly assumed Einstein general relativity with the consequential assumption of the lack of existence of antimatter galaxies and, supernova explosions. 


The point I asked him to clarify was that, in view of the above assumptions, Emilio was forced to assume that antimatter cosmic rays did not exist and, consequently, the antiprotons detected in our upper atmosphere had to be locally created via the collision of protons from cosmic rays with nuclei A of our upper atmosphere, resulting in the reaction (which is still at the foundation of current production of antiprotons)

(4) p+ + A → p+ + p-bar- + p+ + A

In his nice and technically correct style, Emilio answered: "Ruggero, Einstein general relativity is the only solid description of gravitation we have today and, as such, we have to adopt it." 


After a few years, I contacted Emilio again asking him critical comments on the fact that I had problems with reaction (4), since the reaction I could derive was of the type

(5) p+ + A → p+ + p-bar- + particle showers

in which case I had a number of problems, such as the impossibility of treating antiprotons with Dirac's equations, the apparent violation of the CPT theorem, and others. Emilio did not answer my last letter and, for respect, I did not disturb him again. I learned later that Emilio died not so much after my last letter. What a loss for Italy, America and science! Had Emilio be still alive today, he would have used his integrity, authority and commitment to science, and all current shadows in antimatter would be resolved. Ruggero Maria Santilli

We know today that reaction (4) is manipulated to verify aprioristic assumptions, while reaction (5) is the physical one although with a different interpretation of the p-bar indicated below to avoid the violation of basic physical laws and symmetries. In any case, antimatter cosmic rays are routinely detected by astronauts and cosmonauts via flashes in the dark side of our upper atmosphere. These flashes are known to be impossible for conventional cosmic rays. Also, the origin of "antiprotons" via reaction (4) is disproved by statistical calculations on the frequency of said flashes and the very small cross section of cosmic protons with nuclei of our upper atmosphere.

Current evidence outside Einstein interests is that antimatter cosmic rays do indeed exist, although they annihilate into light at the instant of contact with our upper atmosphere [2]. This is the scientific evidence today. Other views are conjectures.

5. Pseudo-protons or anti-protons ?
As it is well known, stars initiate their lives as being an aggregate of hydrogen atoms and first synthesize the neutron according to the known reaction

(6) p + + e- → n + ?

The energies used at CERN for the production of the claimed "anti-protons" are fully sufficient for syntheses (4) due to the fact that the claimed "anti-protons" are produced by collisions of high energy protons on a target, thus implying first the collision of protons with peripheral electron orbitals of the target.

The question mark "?" in reaction (5) is due to the fact that, when the proton is abstracted to be point-like, as necessary for quantum mechanics at the time of Pauli and Fermi, the addition of the hypothetical neutrino is necessary for the conservation of the angular momentum, as well known.

But physical knowledge advances, you know. Nowadays, the proton is invariantly represented by hadronic mechanics the way it is in reality, an extended, non-spherical and deformable charge distribution, in which case the addition of the hypothetical neutrino violates the conservation of the angular momentum due to an new angular contribution not existing during Pauli and Fermi times (Vol. IV, Refs. [9]).

The important point for antimatter is that reaction (4) implies the subsequent step, that of the production ofSantilli pseudo -protons (here denoted with an asterisk) [1,2]

(7) p+ + (e-↑, e-↓) → p*-

Calculations have shown that Santilli "pseudo-proton" has: the same mean-life of the neutron (about 15 minutes); a mass close to that of the proton due to the large value of the Coulomb binding energy in reaction (5); spin 1/2; and negative charge, thus "appearing" to be an anti-proton while it is not. 

In conclusions, direct arguments based on the synthesis of the neutron from the Hydrogen atom inside stars imply that reactions of type (4) or (5) do not necessarily produce "anti-protons, but produce a matter-particles with the appearance of the anti-proton. This conclusion is confirmed by the violation of various physical laws and symmetries by particle reactions intended for the production of real anti-protons, when written without ad hoc adulterations to verify preferred pre-assigned Einsteinian doctrines, as it is the case for reaction (5).

To set the difference between the serious science at our Institute, which is dubitative, and the political science at CERN, which is imperative, we do not claim that the "anti-protons" produced at CERN are necessarily Santilli "pseudo-protons." We do not even know whether some of the "anti-protons" at CERN are true antiparticles and some are "pseudo-protons." We only request that the issue be subjected to serious scientific process and resolved experimentally at CERN, rather than elsewhere.

6. Request for the termination of the CERN employee Gabriele Veneziano
In his capacity as Director of the Theoretical Division at CERN, John Ellis kindly invited R. M. Santilli during a meeting at SLAC in 1990 to visit CERN and present the foundations of hadronic mechanics for both matter and antimatter. Ellis was particularly interested in a presentation of the time-irreversible Lie-admissible branch of hadronic mechanics (in which Ellis had published various papers), due to the strict reversibility over time of Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics [9]. Ellis was also interested in Santilli reporting on the ongoing construction of the scattering theory of hadronic mechanics the underlying Hilbert-Myung-Santilli iso- and geno-spaces (for reversible and irreversible processes, respectively) eliminate all divergencies of quantum mechanics, as discussed by Santilli with Paul Dirac in Florida just prior to his death, and as subsequently worked out in rigorous grounds [12] 

Santilli did visit CERN in 1991and presented a litany of experimental evidence on the inapplicability and certainly not violation) of Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics within hyperdense media, such as those in the interior of hadrons and of high energy scattering regions (Vol. IV of Refs. [9]), such as:

1. Special relativity cannot be even formulated within physical media due to: the notorious lack of inertial reference frames and other reasons; the locally varying character of the speed of light C = c/n; the impossibility of reducing to photons radio waves with one meter wavelength and a host of additional reasons. Quarks are purely mathematical quantities useful for the elaboration of the (excellent) "Mendeleev-type classification" of particles by the standard model, but their assumption as physical constituents of hadrons is a political scheme to maintain Einstein theories where they do not belong. Even assuming that the hypothetical quarks exist as physical particles despite the known impossibility of defining them in our spacetime, even assuming that the hypothetical quarks have a serious confinement against the uncertainty principle, and even assuming that the hypothetical quarks have a point-like charge (as politically crucial to maintain Einstein), Santilli has stated repeatedly in thirty years of works that "There exist no point-like wavepackets in nature" [8]. Therefore, hadrons and scattering regions are constituted by a hyperdense medium composed by the total mutual overlapping of the wavepackets of their constituents, with ensuing nonlinear, nonlocal and non-Hamiltonian effects under which the assumption of special relativity and quantum mechanics is pure 'faith" as stated by Roger Penrose. Additionally, high energy scatterings are highly irreversible over time while special relativity and quantum mechanics are strictly reversible. Therefore, any claim of their exact validity in high energy collisions beyond the process of acceleration is nonscientific (see refs. [12] and Vol. I of refs. [9]).

2. The above inapplicability's of special relativity and quantum mechanics are confirmed by all available direct experimental evidence when examined without ad hoc manipulations. As an example, the 1983 experiment by Aronson et al [13] established the inapplicability of special relativity in the behavior of the mean-life of K-zero mesons with speed from 30 to 100 Gev. The counter-experiment by Grossman et al [14] claimed indeed validity of special relativity, but only from 100 to 400 Gev. As a result, special relativity - and consequently relativistic quantum mechanics - remains invalid from 30 to 100 GeV in all serious scientific circles [[ for which reason, when at Harvard University in the early 1980s, Santilli used to write a "yearly letter" to the directors of various laboratories, including CERN, with the request to finalize this experiment, by receiving in return attacks in return, such as the claim by Leon Lederman - then director of FERMILAB - to Senator Billirakis that "Santilli does not understand particle physics" ]]. In any case, Cardone et al [115,16] (in press at the time Santilli's visited CERN) confirmed the inapplicability of special relativity for the interior of the K-zero mesons despite the allegations by Grossman et al. Arestov et al. [17] provided comprehensive evidence on the inapplicability of special relativity for the hyperdense media inside hadrons and scattering regions at large. Santilli (Vol. IV, Refs. [9]) showed that the claimed validity by Grossman et al. [14] was basically flawed because all data elaborations were based on the prior assumption of special relativity, and the final numerical values were crucially dependent on a plethora of form factors, truncated series, parameters etc. such that the slightest change of one of them would imply violation, thus confirming the widespread view that counter-experiment [15] was commissioned and published by the organized cartel on Einstein under the coordination by Leon Lederman. Additionally, the plot of the experimental data on the Bose-Einstein correlations requires "four" parameters, as well know to CERN physicists, but a Hermitean two point functions can only provide two parameter at best. Hence, the two additional parameters are clear evidence that special relativity and quantum mechanics are not exactly valid for the Bose-Einstein correlation in favor of the exact validity of the covering hadronic mechanics where the four parameters are the diagonal element of the basic isounit providing a numerical representation of the fireball. The list could go on and on and on (Vol. IV, refs. [9]).

3. In 1991, Santilli (page 250 of ref. [16]) had predicted the nowadays well known IsoRedShift (IsoBlueShift) characterized by light losing energy (acquiring energy) while propagating within a cold (hot) medium. Santilli went to CERN also hoping to stimulate an experimental verification or denial. But Santilli IRS-IBS constitute a clear violation of Einstein special relativity within physical media and, consequently, there was no way to have such an experiment considered at CERN or elsewhere. Following ten years of ignorance by the physics community, Santilli conducted comprehensive experiments [9-23] himself at the laboratory of our Institute in Tarpon Springs, Florida, and provided comprehensive experimental verifications of the IRS-IIBS not only for laser light propagating in air, but also for Sunlight at Sunset and Sunrise that showed 100 nm of redshift for the entire spectrum of the visible light in the transition from the Zenith to the horizon according to measurements conducted in the USA and Europe by various independent scientists. If special relativity is clearly inapplicable for a physical medium as thin a our atmosphere, any claim of certain validity for the hyperdense media in the interior of hadrons and scattering region scientific blasphemy, in my view.

As John Ellis is expected to testify for science's sake, despite a presentation in the most appropriate possible scientific language without hints at politics, Santilli's 1991 talks at CERN were strongly opposed by CERN employee Gabriele Veneziano, an internationally known fanatic on Einstein. In this way, the exact validity of Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics for the interior of hadrons and of the scattering region was maintained at CERN up to the recent scam on the Higgs boson [8,10] because, once special relativity and quantum mechanics are inapplicable, any claim that the Higgs boson exists as a physical particle is a vulgar blasphemy.

The employee Veneziano and his cartel perpetrated additional acts of scientific crime with complete impunity to this day, except a condemnation in history. In addition to CERN, Santilli had been invited in 1990 by various universities in Italy, Germany and Greece to deliver the same presentation, namely, the litany of experimental evidence on the lack of exact character of Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics within the hyperdense media in the interior of hadrons and of high energy scattering regions. The employee Veneziano contacted members of his cartel at each of the universities where Santilli was supposed to deliver his invited talk and managed to have his talks cancelled, even when the tickets for his travel had been purchased by the universities themselves!

Only the director of the Democritus Institute in Athens, Greece, rejected Veneziano request, and did allow Santilli to make his scientific presentation. In particular, the Director called Veneziano and told him in the presence of Santilli and a large audience "Mister Veneziano, Greece is the land where democracy initiated and, therefore, Prof. Santilli is indeed allowed to deliver his talks on the limitations of Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics.

Following the above organized scientific misconduct by the CERN employee G. Veneziano and the members of his cartel who obeyed his sinister request, the Committee on Scientific Ethics hired an Investigative Agency whose report provided evidence that Mr. Veneziano acted in coordination with the employees of Harvard University Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow and Sidney Coleman who had such an unethical audacity to oppose in the early 1980s the will of the Government of the United States of America by publicly discrediting Santilli's research under DOE contract in the limitations of Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics. These investigations provided proof beyond credible doubt of the existence of an international cartel on Einstein solely intent to exploit society for their self-interests via the abuse of the credibility of abusively obtained academic positions under the misuse of trillions of dollars of taxpayer money. This denunciation is mandated by the fact that, rather than subsiding and avoiding the suppression of scientific democracy in the U.S.A., the organized international cartel on Einstein has increased the misconducts through the decades with total impunity guaranteed by accomplices and servants (see the 1984 Documentation(http://www.scientificethics.org/IlGrandeGrido.htm) that includes Ethical Probe of Einstein Followers in the USA: An Insider's view; its three volumes of documentation; and the supporting editorial by The Harvard Crimson dubbing these unethical conducts The Politics of Science; see also 2007 denunciation Update and Denunciation of the Gangsterism by the physicist Steven Weinberg).

7. Our Requests:


I: We request first and above all the implementation of due scientific process at CERN on Santilli's comparative measurements of the gravity of electrons and positrons [3.4] by inviting for a presentation at CERN the leading experimentalist in the field, Prof. Victor de Haan, and the leading theoretician in the field, Prof. Ruggero M. Santilli. Following these technical presentations, we request CERN to conduct Santilli gravity test prior to the test on alleged "anti-Hydrogen atoms," because the former resolutory, while the latter is prone to not unusual manipulations by the organized cartel on Einstein intent in adapting nature to preferred theories.


II: We request that, as a condition for serious ethics and accountability in the use of large public funds, the issue whether the claimed "anti-protons" are truly antiparticles or only "pseudo-protons" be resolved with a serious scientific process in the dismissal of opposing evidence in refereed journals, rather than the dishonest disqualifications in CERN corridors, culminating in experimental resolution beyond doubt prior to any test of the gravity of the alleged "anti-Hydrogen atom."


III. We request that, as a condition for CERN to regain the lost credibility, prove lack of dependence from the organized cartel of self-interests on Einstein, and for evident need of ethics and accountability in the use of large public funds, that you terminate any and all direct or indirect affiliation of Gabriele Veneziano at CERN and prevent him from any additional visit at CERN. It is also your duty to review and investigate the actions of Veneziano and his affiliates in light of the personal financial and other advantages that they all have derived from the suppression of the litany of evidence on the impossibility for Einstein special relativity and quantum mechanics to be valid inside hadrons and scattering regions (Vol. IV of Refs. [9]) and warns the members of Veneziano's cartel remaining in the employment of CERN to abstain from abusing CERN's credibility for any additional suppression of scientific process for their self-interest without any sense of dignity or shame.

Technical questions should be addressed to Prof. R.M. Santilli at the email basicresearch at i-b-r.org by clarifying whether they are confidential contact or for uploading in this blog. Contributions to this blog should be submitted to the email luca at scientificethics.org, attention of Luca Petronio, the Editor of the blog who acts following Wikipedia rules. Serious scientists can be certain of utmost respect. Crooks expecting decent treatments need medical examination.

Pamela Fleming
Spokesperson
The Institute for Basic Research

REFERENCES

[1] R. M. Santilli, "Anti-protons or pseudo-protons?" IBR preprint TH-14-339, in press at a refereed journal that cannot be disclosed to prevent the usual interference by the ongoing organized scientific crime.

[2] R. M. Santilli, "Apparent detection of antimatter galaxies with a refractive telescope with concave lenses," Clifford Analysis, Clifford Algebras and their Applications Vol. 3, pages 1-26, 2014 (Cambridge, UK)
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Antimatter-telescope-2013-final.pdf

[3] R. M. Santilli, Isodual Theory of Antimatter with Application to Antigravity, Grand Unification and the Spacetime Machine, Springer 2001.

[4] V. de Haan, "Santilli's comparative test of the gravity of electrons and positrons
in a horizontal supercooled and supervacuum tube,"
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-gravity-experiment.pdf

[5] A. P. Mills, "Possibilities of measuring the gravitational mass of electrons and positrons in free horizontal flight, contributed paper for the Proceedings of the International Conference on Antimatter, held in Sepino, Italy, May 1996, published in the Hadronic J. 1996 19, 77-96 
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-11.pdf

[6] V. de Haan, "Proposal for the realization of Santilli comparative test on the gravity of electrons and positrons via a horizontal supercooled vacuum tube," Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Lie-Admissible Treatment of Irreversible Processes, C. Corda, Editor, Kathmandu University, 2011, pages 57-67 
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/deHaan-Arxiv.pdf

[7] BBC announcement, "Antigravity gets first test at Cern's Alpha experiment,"
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22355187

[8] J. V. Kadeisvili, "Obscurantism at CERN on God's particle," PRWeb Announcement
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/cern-obscurantism.php [9] R. M. Santilli, Hadronic mathematics, Mechanics and Chemistry, Volumes I, II, III, IV and V, International Academic Press 2008, http://www.i-b-r.org/Hadronic-Mechanics.htm

[10] R. Anderson, "Denunciations of the Nobel Committee for Physics," PRWeb Announcement
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/Denunciation-Nobel-Comm-Phys.html

[11] R. M. Santilli, "Does antimatter emit a new light?" Invited paper for the proceedings of the International Conference on Antimatter, held in Sepino, Italy, on May 1996, published in Hyperfine Interactions 1997, 109, 63-81 
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-28.pdf

[12] R. M. Santilli and A. O. O. E. Animalu, "isotopic and genotopic scattering theories of hadronic mechanics without dibvergencies," Papers I, II, III, IV and Vin the Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Lie-Admissible Treatment of Irreversible Processes,s C. Corda, Editor, Kathmandu University (2011) pages 163-177
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Isoscattering-I.pdf
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Isoscattering-II.pdf
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Isoscattering-III.pdf
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Isoscattering-IV.pdf
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Isoscattering-V.pdf

[13] S. H. Aronson et al., Phys. Rev. D Vol. 28, 495 (1983)

[14] N. Grossman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 59, 18 (1987)

[15] F. Cardone et al., J. Phys. G: Part. Phys. Vol. 18, L61-L65 (1992) 
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-32.pdf

[16] F. Cardone et al., J. Phys. G: Part. Phys. L141-L144 (1992)
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-32.pdf

http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-52.pdf

[18] R. M. Santilli, Isotopic Generalizations of Galilei and Einstein Relativities, Vols. I [9a] and II [9b] (1991), International Academic Press,
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-01.pdf
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-61.pdf

[19] R. M. Santilli, "Experimental Verifications of IsoRedShift with Possible Absence of Universe Expansion, Big Bang, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy," The Open Astronomy Journal 3, 124 (2010),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Santilli-isoredshift.pdf

[20] R. M. Santilli, "Experimental Verification of IsoRedShift and its Cosmological Implications," AIP Proceedings Vol. 1281, pp. 882-885 (2010)
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Isoredshift-Letter.pdf

[21] G. West and G. Amato, "Experimental Confoirmation of Santilli's IsoRedShift and IsoBlueShift," Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 12, 169 (2012),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Confirmation-IRS-IBS.pdf

[22] R. M. Santilli, G. West and G. Amato. "Experimental Confirmation of the IsoRedShift at Sun at Sunset and Sunrise with Consequential Absence of Universe Expansion and Related Conjectures, " Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 12, 165 (2012).
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Confirmation-sun-IRS.pdf

[23] H. Ahmar, G. Amato, J. V. Kadeisvili, J. Manuel, G. West, and O. Zogorodnia, "Additional experimental confirmations of Santilli's IsoRedShift and the consequential expected absence of universe expansion," Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 13, 321 (2013),
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/IRS-confirmations-212.pdf

===================================

PRWeb News Release
Apparent Detection of Antimatter Galaxies via Santilli's Telescope with Concave Lenses
Announcement
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/02/prweb11589410.htm
Report
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Apparent-detect.pdf
--------------------------------------
PRWeb News Release
Detection of Antimatter Galaxies via Santilli Telescope with Concave Lenses
Confirmed at the Sorbonne University, France
Announcement
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/03/prweb11670914.htm
Report
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/PRWeb-16.pdf
--------------------------------------
PRWeb News Release
Trajectories of Antimatter Asteroids That Could Hit Earth
Computed by Planetary Experts
Announcement
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/05/prweb11842758.htm
Repoprt
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/9c2db357-f730-4113-8690-0539abd621f1.pdf
--------------------------------------
PRWeb News Release
Prof. R. M. Santilli Interviewed by French Scientists on the
Danger for Earth of Antimatter Asteroids
Announcement http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/06/prweb11902027.htm
Report
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/9c2db357-f730-4113-8690-0539abd621f1.pdf
------------------------------------------------
PRWeb News release
Studies for the Detection of Antimatter Asteroids Promoted 
by the R. M. Santilli Foundation
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/9/prweb11118385.htm
Report
http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/Studies-antimatter.pdf

====================================

Selamlar
-- 
P.S...Support www.ieja.net by publishing papers.

 Prof.Dr.Abdullah Harmancı

Hacettepe Üniversitesi
Matematik Bölümü
Beytepe,Ankara
Türkiye.

harmanci at hacetepe.edu.tr,

www.ieja.net

http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~harmanci/
-------------- sonraki bölüm --------------
Bir HTML eklentisi temizlendi...
URL: <http://yunus.listweb.bilkent.edu.tr/cgi-bin/mailman/private/turkmath/attachments/20140606/f64e4f57/attachment-0001.html>